CRAN Package Check Results for Package noncompliance

Last updated on 2026-05-17 11:51:59 CEST.

Flavor Version Tinstall Tcheck Ttotal Status Flags
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang 0.2.2 16.70 44.56 61.26 OK
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc 0.2.2 21.97 32.03 54.00 OK
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang 0.2.2 23.00 68.38 91.38 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc 0.2.2 31.00 65.43 96.43 NOTE
r-devel-windows-x86_64 0.2.2 17.00 78.00 95.00 OK
r-patched-linux-x86_64 0.2.2 15.66 41.03 56.69 OK
r-release-linux-x86_64 0.2.2 31.65 41.46 73.11 OK
r-release-macos-arm64 0.2.2 4.00 13.00 17.00 OK
r-release-macos-x86_64 0.2.2 11.00 72.00 83.00 OK
r-release-windows-x86_64 0.2.2 18.00 82.00 100.00 OK
r-oldrel-macos-arm64 0.2.2 OK
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 0.2.2 10.00 79.00 89.00 OK
r-oldrel-windows-x86_64 0.2.2 16.00 96.00 112.00 OK

Check Details

Version: 0.2.2
Check: compiled code
Result: NOTE File ‘noncompliance/libs/noncompliance.so’: Found no calls to: ‘R_registerRoutines’, ‘R_useDynamicSymbols’ It is good practice to register native routines and to disable symbol search. See ‘Writing portable packages’ in the ‘Writing R Extensions’ manual. Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc